April 16, 2020

A Global Overview of Fuel Quality Monitoring Systems (FQMS)

Subscribers can access the full report from our Global Fuel Specifications service.  
Not a subscriber? Create an account


Stratas Advisors observes that more than 150 countries have set fuel specifications and regulations. However, not all of them have or enforce fuel quality monitoring legislation, or put fuel quality monitoring systems (FQMS) in place. This is because the most important implementation building blocks for any fuel quality strategy are sampling, monitoring and enforcement. Fuel specifications or standards, however strict they are, do not always guarantee good quality fuel at the filling station.

The foundation for good quality and on-spec fuels at the pump is based on two key elements:

  • National standards; and
  • The ability to ensure and control fuel quality at the point of distribution – the filling station.

The latter can only be achieved through implementation and commitment to an effective fuel quality monitoring program. Without the effective monitoring of fuel quality at the pump, there is no basis for a national standard for better fuel specifications. For example where the quality of marketed fuel meets very stringent requirements in the EU, Japan and the U.S., the result was achieved through the variety of factors implemented at the national and/or state levels. Experience in these jurisdictions has shown this to be the potential weak link in many fuel programs and an area to be strengthened.

The full report updates a previous report (see Insights, May 16, 2016), and provides the objective of FQMS, and summarizes and compares FQMS of various legislations and countries including the entities engaged, scale of these systems, financial resources etc. It also includes case studies describing the mandatory FQM legislations currently in place in developed regions and how they successfully achieve good quality and on-spec fuels, and also how it has been challenging for developing regions to ensure success of their FQMS. Since the last report, the case studies for the EU and the U.S. remain the same, while case studies for Brazil and Russia have been updated in this report. In addition, new case studies for South Korea and South Africa have been added to this report, replacing Japan and Kenya respectively since the last report.

Regional and Country Comparisons

As shown by the Appendix of the full report, fuel quality monitoring programs and enforcement schemes are mandatory in a total of 77 countries and territories, and voluntary in another 20 countries and territories (see map below). Most countries and regions agree that there are two distinct parts to a fuel quality monitoring program:

  • Monitoring fuel quality to ensure that fuel sold at the pump is in compliance with the specifications set under national and/or regional fuel quality legislation. This includes industry reporting and sampling requirements; and
  • Policing and enforcing fuel quality requirements to ensure compliance, and sanctioning those not in compliance.

However, depending on various factors such as a country’s economic situation, culture and traditions, the legal obligation is either put on the industry to report fuel quality or on the legislature as in the case of most countries.

Countries with Mandatory or Voluntary FQMS


Subscribers can access the full report from our Global Fuel Specifications service.  
Not a subscriber? Create an account

Sign-Up for Email Alerts