Three Countries Move Up in Top 100 Ranking on Diesel Sulfur Limits
Stratas Advisors
Subscribers can access the full report from our Global Fuel Specifications service.
Not a subscriber? Create an account
Stratas Advisors’ annual Top 100 ranking again confirms the continued worldwide movement toward lower sulfur content in diesel and cites a number of countries that have positioned themselves through policy initiatives to make advances in this area in the near future. However, it is worthwhile to note that aspects other than sulfur reduction ― among them cetane, lubricity, polyaromatics, density and cold flow ― are important in determining diesel quality.
The last ranking was carried out in April 2021 (see Insights, April 27, 2021). EU countries, required to implement 100% market penetration of sulfur-free (less than 10 ppm) fuels since January 2009, continue to dominate the Top 40. Sweden, which led the way with full market penetration in 1990, continues to reign at No. 1.
Three countries moved up or were newly added to the 2022 ranking, compared to the seven countries in the 2021 ranking. Led by Colombia which ranks at 71st place, the three countries include:
- Botswana
- Colombia
- Ecuador
Many of the other countries that dropped in the ranking (e.g. Brazil, which in fact dropped out of the Top 100 this year) did not alter their diesel fuel specifications but were simply passed by others that implemented stricter sulfur limits or supplied lower sulfur fuels ahead of legislation. As a result, Vietnam and Bahrain dropped out of the 2022 ranking and were replaced by Botswana and Ecuador as they enter (or re-enter) the Top 100 for the first time. This is due to reductions in sulfur limits that have been implemented over the past year, or phase out of higher sulfur diesel on the domestic market. Ecuador jumped the farthest and also moved up the highest with 18 places to re-enter the ranking at 99th place, followed by Botswana with 16 places to enter at 96th place and Colombia with 10 places to rank at 71st place.
South Africa sits at the 100th place with a maximum sulfur limit of 500 ppm in effect since July 2006 along with specifications in place for 50 ppm and 10 ppm sulfur diesel, thus displacing other countries out of the Top 100 which set higher sulfur limits. Even though cities and provinces are not officially ranked, it is worthwhile to note that select cities and provinces of Brazil, Iran and Peru required diesel fuel with lower sulfur of 50 ppm or below ahead of the rest of the country. For example, Brazil required 10 ppm sulfur diesel in select metropolitan regions since January 2013 while the rest of Brazil is currently required to meet a maximum sulfur limit of 500 ppm. However, Brazil, Iran and Peru are currently out of the Top 100 with national sulfur limits of max 500 ppm and above.
To establish this ranking, four primary criteria were used in the following order of importance:
- Maximum allowable limits in national standards and legislation;
- Year of implementation for sulfur limits as required by legislation and year of voluntary implementation, if any;
- Limits in local or regional standards (such as specifications for cities or states); and
- Market levels are also used wherever available to more accurately rank countries sharing the same legislated limit.
Maximum On-Road Diesel Sulfur Limits (2022)
Source: Stratas Advisors, February 2022
2022 Top 100 Diesel Sulfur Ranking
Rank |
Country |
Change |
1 |
Sweden |
+0 |
2 |
Germany |
+0 |
3 |
Japan |
+0 |
4 |
Finland |
+0 |
5 |
Denmark |
+0 |
Hungary |
+0 |
|
Luxembourg |
+0 |
|
Netherlands |
+0 |
|
9 |
Portugal |
+0 |
10 |
Australia |
+0 |
Austria |
+0 |
|
Belgium |
+0 |
|
Bulgaria |
+0 |
|
Cyprus |
+0 |
|
Czech Republic |
+0 |
|
Estonia |
+0 |
|
France |
+0 |
|
Greece |
+0 |
|
Iceland |
+0 |
|
Ireland |
+0 |
|
Israel |
+0 |
|
Italy |
+0 |
|
Latvia |
+0 |
|
Liechtenstein |
+0 |
|
Lithuania |
+0 |
|
Malta |
+0 |
|
New Zealand |
+0 |
|
Norway |
+0 |
|
Poland |
+0 |
|
Romania |
+0 |
|
Slovakia |
+0 |
|
Slovenia |
+0 |
|
South Korea |
+0 |
|
Spain |
+0 |
|
Switzerland |
+0 |
|
United Kingdom |
+0 |
|
Turkey |
+0 |
|
North Macedonia |
+0 |
|
39 |
Hong Kong |
+0 |
40 |
Armenia |
+0 |
41 |
Albania |
+0 |
Croatia |
+0 |
|
Montenegro |
+0 |
|
Taiwan |
+0 |
|
Kosovo |
+0 |
|
46 |
New Caledonia |
+0 |
# |
Brazil, Select Cities |
|
47 |
Singapore |
+0 |
Serbia |
+0 |
|
49 |
United Arab Emirates |
+0 |
50 |
Belarus |
+0 |
Suriname |
+0 |
|
52 |
Russia |
+0 |
Morocco |
+0 |
|
Lebanon |
+0 |
|
55 |
Macau |
+0 |
56 |
China |
+0 |
Mayotte |
+0 |
|
58 |
Ukraine |
+0 |
59 |
Fiji |
+0 |
Moldova |
+0 |
|
61 |
India |
+0 |
62 |
Malaysia |
+0 |
63 |
Bhutan* |
+0 |
64 |
Canada |
+0 |
65 |
United States |
+0 |
66 |
Guam |
+0 |
67 |
Chile |
+0 |
68 |
Panama* |
+0 |
69 |
Bermuda* |
+0 |
Curacao* |
+0 |
|
71 |
Colombia |
+10 |
72 |
Thailand |
-1 |
73 |
Uruguay |
-1 |
74 |
Kenya |
-1 |
Paraguay |
-1 |
|
76 |
Philippines |
-1 |
77 |
Kazakhstan |
-1 |
78 |
Georgia |
-1 |
79 |
Nepal |
-1 |
80 |
Cambodia |
-1 |
Namibia |
-1 |
|
82 |
Syria* |
-1 |
French Polynesia |
-1 |
|
# |
Peru, Select Cities |
|
84 |
Costa Rica |
+0 |
85 |
Mauritius |
+0 |
# |
Iran, Select Cities |
|
86 |
Rwanda |
+0 |
Tanzania |
+0 |
|
Uganda |
+0 |
|
89 |
Malawi |
+0 |
90 |
Nigeria |
+0 |
Ghana |
+0 |
|
Mozambique |
+0 |
|
93 |
Zimbabwe |
+0 |
Gambia* |
+0 |
|
95 |
Benin |
+0 |
96 |
Botswana |
+16 |
97 |
Bosnia & Herzegovina |
-1 |
98 |
Mongolia |
-1 |
99 |
Ecuador |
+18 |
100 |
South Africa |
-2 |
Notes: # Not actually included in ranking; highlighted for significant achievement.
* Best ranking based on available information.
Source: Stratas Advisors, February 2022
Subscribers can access the full report from our Global Fuel Specifications service.
Not a subscriber? Create an account